Welcome to Visited Lingnan Modern Clinics In Surgery, Today is

Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (03): 353-356.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009?976X.2018.03.029

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The clinical experience in using duramater tension?reduced suture pericranium in decompressive hemicraniectomy of acute transtentorial herniation

CHEN Qinbiao1,GUO Yongtong2,HU Zhi1,ZHAO Yiying1,LIU Zhenghao1,ZHOU Zhiwei1,HUANG Yutao1,DENG Yuefei1,LEI Bingxi1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurg,Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510289,China;2. Department of Neurosurg,Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital Zengcheng Branch,Sun Yat?sen University,Guangzhou 511289,China
  • Contact: LEI Binxi

颅骨骨膜减张修补硬脑膜在急性小脑幕切迹疝去骨瓣减压手术中的应用

陈钦标1, 郭泳彤2, 胡智2, 赵义营1, 刘正豪1, 周志威1, 黄毓韬1,邓跃飞1, 雷炳喜1*   

  1. 1. 中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院神经外科,广州 510120;2. 中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院增城院区神经外科,广州 511289
  • 通讯作者: 雷炳喜

Abstract: [Abstract] Objective To compare the clinical effects of two surgical procedures between duramater tension-reduced suture using pericranium and traditional dura mater suture in decompressive hemicraniectomy of acute transtentorial herniation. Methods From January 2016 to June 2017,a retrospective analysis was performed on the prognosis of patients with decompressive hemicraniectomy of acute transtentorial herniation. Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the GOS difference between dura mater tension?reduced suture using pericranium and traditional dura mater suture. Results When compared with traditional dura mater suture(control group,n=24),the patients underwent dura mater tension-reduced suture using pericranium (observation group,n=26) showed lower GOS scores (P< 0.05). Conclusion Dura mater tension?reduced suture was superior to traditional dura mater suture in prognosis and reducing the occurrence of complications and should be generalized.

Key words: decompressive hemicraniectomy, acute transtentorial herniation, pericranium, dura mater tension?reduced suture

摘要: [摘要] 目的 分析比较急性小脑幕切迹疝去骨瓣减压手术中,颅骨骨膜瓣减张修补硬脑膜与常规缝合硬脑膜的临床疗效。方法 回顾性统计分析 2016 年 1 月份~2017 年 6 月份我院急性小脑幕切迹疝去骨瓣减压手术患者的预后,采用曼?惠特尼 U 检验(Mann?Whitney U test)分析颅骨骨膜瓣减张修补硬脑膜(观察组,n=26)与常规缝合硬脑膜(对照组,n=241)两组患者 GOS 的差异。结果 两组组患者 GOS 比较,U 检验发现硬脑膜减张缝合组(观察组)的 GOS 与对照组之间的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 硬脑膜减张缝合组的患者预后明显优于常规缝合组, 并发症明显小于对照组。

关键词: 颅骨骨膜, 硬脑膜减张缝合, 去骨瓣减压术, 急性小脑幕切迹疝

CLC Number: