Comparison of efficacy between minimally invasive percutaneous antagradeureteroscopy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the treatment of impacted proximal ureteral stones

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2017.05.020

Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery ›› 2017, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05): 582-586.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2017.05.020

Previous Articles Next Articles

Comparison of efficacy between minimally invasive percutaneous antagradeureteroscopy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the treatment of impacted proximal ureteral stones

LIU Hongjun，KANG Yongsheng，XIAN Xiaohui，LIN Dejin，TANG Yunfeng，LI Huaqiang，LIANG Yu， CHEN Jinmian，BO Jiaqiang

Department of Urology，Lianjiang People，s Hospital，Lianjiang，Guangdong 542200，China.

迷你经皮肾镜与后腹腔镜下治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的疗效比较及文献复习

刘红军康永胜冼晓晖林德进唐云峰李华强梁羽陈景勉卜佳强

广东省廉江市人民医院

通讯作者: 刘红军

Abstract

Key words: minimally invasive percutaneous antgradeureteroscopiy , impacted proximal ureteral stones, retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy

关键词: 输尿管上段嵌顿性结石, 后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术, 迷你经皮肾镜输尿管取石术

CLC Number:

R693+.4

LIU Hongjun，KANG Yongsheng，XIAN Xiaohui，LIN Dejin，TANG Yunfeng，LI Huaqiang，LIANG Yu， CHEN Jinmian，BO Jiaqiang. Comparison of efficacy between minimally invasive percutaneous antagradeureteroscopy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the treatment of impacted proximal ureteral stones [J]. Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery, 2017, 17(05): 582-586.

刘红军康永胜冼晓晖林德进唐云峰李华强梁羽陈景勉卜佳强. 迷你经皮肾镜与后腹腔镜下治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的疗效比较及文献复习[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2017, 17(05): 582-586.

Comparison of efficacy between minimally invasive percutaneous antagradeureteroscopy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the treatment of impacted proximal ureteral stones

迷你经皮肾镜与后腹腔镜下治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的疗效比较及文献复习

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 1

Recommended Articles

Metrics