Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery ›› 2015, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06): 690-692.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2015.06.012
Previous Articles Next Articles
Ye Junhua, Huang Minghua, Zhao Haisheng
叶俊华 黄明华 赵海生
通讯作者:
Abstract:
【Abstract】 Objective To observe the effect of PPH (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids) combined with rectal mucosal folds in treatment of I type rectal prolapse. Methods〓Fifty patients with I type rectal prolapse were selected and performed surgical treatment from October 2010 to October 2014, in whom 25 cases underwent PPH combined with rectal mucosal folds (observation group) and another 25 cases received treatment with injecting sclerosing agent (control group). The clinical effect was compered between two groups. Results〓The patients in observation group had less operative time, hospital stay, postoperative complications and recurrence, more alleviative surgical pain, and faster postoperative anal function recovery than that in control. Conclusion〓PPH combined with rectal mucosal folds is optional approach for treatment of I type rectal prolapse.
Key words: Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids (PPH), Rectal mucosal folds, Hemorrhoids, Rectal prolapse
摘要:
【摘要】 目的 观察吻合器痔上粘膜环切吻合器术(PPH)联合直肠粘膜折叠术治疗I度直肠脱垂的临床疗效。方法〓选择2010年10月至2014年10月间于我科确诊患有I度直肠脱垂并首次行手术治疗的50例患者,其中25例患者采用传统手术设为对照组,25例患者采用吻合器痔上粘膜环切术联合直肠粘膜折叠术设为观察组。结果〓采用吻合器痔上粘膜环切术联合直肠粘膜折叠术治疗的I度直肠脱垂患者的平均手术时间、住院时间、术后72小时疼痛情况、术后并发症、术后肛门功能恢复情况、远期复发均明显优于传统手术治疗(P<0.05)。结论〓吻合器痔上粘膜环切术联合直肠粘膜折叠术对I度直肠脱垂具有操作简单、疗效确切以及痛苦小等优势,值得推广和应用。
关键词: 吻合器痔上粘膜环切术, 直肠脱垂, 直肠粘膜折叠术, 痔
CLC Number:
R657.1
Ye Junhua, Huang Minghua, Zhao Haisheng. Treatment of I type rectal prolapse by using the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids combined with rectal mucosal folds[J]. Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery, 2015, 15(06): 690-692.
叶俊华 黄明华 赵海生. 吻合器痔上粘膜环切术联合直肠粘膜折叠治疗I度直肠脱垂的研究[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2015, 15(06): 690-692.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.lingnanwaike.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2015.06.012
http://www.lingnanwaike.com/EN/Y2015/V15/I06/690
[1]陈喜志,王运红,蓝活. 吻合器痔上粘膜环切术与外剥内扎术治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度内痔的疗效比较[J]. 现代医院,2014,14(05):24-26. [2]艾可为,杨继武,刘茂希. 吻合器痔上粘膜环切术治疗内痔356例总结[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志,2012,16(05):345-347. [3] 肛裂、直肠脱垂、肛瘘、痔的诊断标准(试行草案)[J].中医杂志,2003,44(z1):313-314. [4]房平承,陈方,朱少伟,等. 痔吻合器治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2011,05(3):357-359. [5]林友彬,杨中权.PPH联合硬化剂注射治疗不完全性直肠脱垂[J].结直肠肛门外科,2013,19(4):247-248. [6]张学平,何文梅,郭虹霞. 改良PPH术治疗老年性直肠脱垂37例的临床观察[J]. 现代诊断与治疗,2014, 11:2594-2595. [7] 邸爱婷,迟玉花,赵刚,等.复合术式治疗直肠脱垂15例[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2014,05:550-551. [8] 林友彬,杨中权.PPH联合硬化剂注射治疗不完全性直肠脱垂[J].结直肠肛门外科,2013,19(4):247-248. [9] 赵贵基,富晓敏.PPH治疗直肠黏膜脱垂所致出口梗阻型便秘47例[J].医学理论与实践,2013,26(9):1187-1189. [10]张昭.三联术治疗直肠脱垂35例疗效观察[J].陕西医学杂志,2014,(9):1267-1267. [11]V. Lohsiriwat. Hemorrhoids: from basic pathophysiology to clinical management. World J Gastroenterol,2012,18(17):2009-2017 [12]A. Panarese, D. Pironi, M. Vendettuoliet al. Stapled and conventional Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: different solutions for different targets[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis,2012,27(4):483-487