The clinical research of all-digital mammography improve the detection rate of simultaneity of bilateral breast cancer

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2022.03.002

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the accuracy rate of using full digital mammography to detect the simultaneous bilateral primary breast cancer, and to explore its value in the diagnosis and treatment of bilateral primary breast cancer for the same period. Methods Twelve cases of bilateral primary breast cancer for the same period were selected in our hospital between 2008-2011, and all the patients were underwent digital mammography X-ray photography, and color Doppler ultrasound, MRI, and all of them were comparative with pathological results analysis; postoperative follow-up period of two years, and the survival curves was made. Results The total detection accuracy： the all-digital mammography was 83.3%, ultrasound and MRI accuracy were 54.2% and 45.8% respectively. Compared to the all-digital mammography, the differences were statistically significant （P<0.05, P<0.01）. First primary cancer detection accuracy： the all-digital mammography was 83.3%, ultrasound and MRI accuracy were 66.7% and 50.0% respectively. Compared to the all-digital mammography, there has no significant difference （P>0.05）. Detection accuracy of second primary cancers： the all-digital mammography was 100%, both of ultrasound and MRI were 41.7%. Compared to the all-digital mammography, the differences were statistically significant （P<0.05）. The postoperative follow-up results show that contralateral breast cancer patients found no missed diagnosis. Conclusion The detection rate of all-digital mammography was higher than ultrasound and MRI for bilateral primary cancer early on one side and a second primary cancer, and it can be more accurate and earlier to found the lesions by using the all-digital mammography.

Key words: digital mammography, bilateral breast cancer, detection rate

摘要： 目的评价全数字钼靶在临床上检测同时性双侧原发乳腺癌的准确率,探讨其在同时性双侧原发乳腺癌的临床诊断和治疗中的价值。方法选取本院2006年6月~2011年12月间收治的12例同时性双侧原发乳腺癌患者,所有病例均行全数字钼靶X线摄影、彩色多普勒超声和MRI检查,并与术后病理结果对比分析;术后进行为期2年的随访。结果总检出灵敏度：全数字钼靶诊断的灵敏度为83.3%,超声和MRI检查的灵敏度分别为54.2%、45.8%,与全数字钼靶比较差异均具有统计学意义（P<0.01,P<0.05）;第一原发癌的检出灵敏度：全数字钼靶为83.3%,超声和MRI检查分别为66.7%、50.0%,与全数字钼靶相比差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）;第二原发癌的检出灵敏度：全数字钼靶诊断的灵敏度为83.3%,超声和MRI检查的灵敏度均41.7%,与全数字钼靶相比,差异均具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。术后随访的结果表明,未发现漏诊的对侧乳腺癌患者。结论全数字钼靶对双侧原发癌中较早期的一侧及第二原发癌的检出率均高于超声及MRI检查,能够更早更准确地发现病灶。

关键词: 全数字钼靶, 双侧乳腺癌, 检出率

CLC Number:

R737.9
R445

CHEN Jing-Sen, ZHANG Wen-Xia, LI Huan, XIONG Zhi-yi, WANG En-li. The clinical research of all-digital mammography improve the detection rate of simultaneity of bilateral breast cancer[J]. Lingnan Modern Clinics In Surgery, 2022, 22(03): 223-226.

陈景森, 张文夏, 李欢, 熊志毅, 王恩礼. 全数字钼靶提高同时性双侧乳腺癌检出率的临床研究[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2022, 22(03): 223-226.

References

[1] Engin K.Prognostic factors in bilateral breast cancer[J]. Neoplasma,1994,41(6):353-357.
[2] Rovatti M,Gerosa E,Turi V,et al.Multiple primary malignant neoplasms[J]. Minerva Chirurgica,1995,50(11):949-958.
[3] Ozturk A, Alco G, Sarsenov D, et al.Synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancer: A long-term experience[J]. J BUON, 2018, 23(6):1591-1600.
[4] Rovatti M,Gerosa E,Turi V,et al.Multiple primary malignant neoplasms[J]. Minerva Chirurgica,1995, 50(11):949-958.
[5] Brenner H, Engelsrnam B, Stegnaie C, et al.Clinical epidemiclogy of bilated breast cancer[J]. Cancer, 1933, 72: 3629-3635.
[6] Awad AT, el-Husseini G, Anwar M, et al. Bilateral primary breast cancer: a clinicpathological study of the second primary[J]. Int Surg,1996, 81(1):57-60.
[7] 沈镇宙,韩企夏,庄传经,等. 双侧乳腺癌71例分析[J]. 上海医学, 1989, 12(5): 252-255.
[8] Bruce LD, Robert WG, Robyn LB, et al.Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Intraductal Papilloma of the Breast[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2003, 21(8):887-892.
[9] Sakai T, Ozkurt E, DeSantis S, et al. National trends of synchronous bilateral breast cancer incidence in the United States[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2019, 178(1):161-167.
[10] Mejdahl MK, Wohlfahrt J, Holm M, et al.Breast cancer mortality in synchronous bilateral breast cancer patients[J]. Br J Cancer, 2019, 120(7): 761-767.
[11] 张秀梅, 周宏伟, 陈艳丽,等. MR 扩散加权和动态增强成像在老年乳腺肿瘤中的应用[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2010, 30(18): 2589-2591.
[12] Huang W, Fisher PR, Dulaimy K,et al.Detection of Breast Malignancy:Diagnostic MR Protocol for Improved Specificity[J]. Radiology, 2004, 232(2):585-591.
[13] 蔡丰, 张涛, 郭张留, 等. 数字乳腺X 线机与传统乳腺X 线机的临床应用对比研究[J]. 中华放射学杂志,2002, 36(11): 981.
[14] 任永富,阎若元,等.超声和钼靶X线联合诊断乳腺肿瘤[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志,2007, (15):58-61.
[15] Ziv E,ShePherd J,Smith-BindmanR,et al. Mammographic Breast density and family history of breast cancer[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2003, 95(7):556-558.
[16] Tice JA, CummingsSR,Smith-Bindman R, et al. Using Clinical factors and mammographic breast density to Estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a New Predietive model[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2008, 148(5):337-347.
[17] Martaindale SR.Breast MR Imaging: Atlas of Anatomy, Physiology, Pathophysiology, and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems Lexicon[J]. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 2018, 26(2):179-190.
[18] Hagen AL, Kvistad KA, Maehle L, et al.Sensitivity of MRI versus conventional sereening in the diagnosis of BRCA-associated breast cancer in a national prospective series[J]. Breast, 2007, 16(4):367-374.