Meta-analysis of the rationality of arthroplasty in the treatment of undisplaced femoral neck fracture

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2020.06.017

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To compare the effect of internal fixation and arthroplasty for senile femoral neck fracture without displacement. Methods The MEDLINE, Ovid and China KnowledgeNet database were searched,entry criteria were over 70 years of age; garden I or II femoral neck fracture and study comparing screw internal fixation with arthroplasty. The main result is the reoperation rate. Secondary outcomes included mortality, postoperative complications, and hip Harris score. Data was independently extracted from included studies by two researchers. Stata MP16 software was used for Statistical analysis. Results Of the 901 selected articles, 5 literatures met the selection criteria, with a total of 28,591 patients （14,296 receiving arthroplasty and 14,295 receiving internal fixation）. The reoperation rate in the internal fixation group was higher than that in the joint replacement group （OR：0.02,95% CI：0.43~0.84）, and the difference was statistically significant （Z=3.46, P=0.00）. There was no significant difference in one-year mortality risk, complications and Harris scores between the two treatment groups. Conclusion For the senile femoral neck fracture without displacement, arthroplasty can reduce the reoperation rate, which is better than internal fixation. It is reasonable to perform the first stage arthroplasty for the elderly with undisplaced femoral neck fracture.

Key words: undisplaced femoral neck fracture, senile, arthroplasty, internal fixation

摘要： 目的比较无移位的老年股骨颈骨折内固定与关节置换术的疗效。方法以“Internal Fixation”、“Arthroplasty”、“Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures”、“Elderly”为英文检索词,以“关节置换术”、“无移位股骨颈骨折”、“内固定”、“老年”为中文检索词,检索了MEDLINE、Ovid和中国知网数据库、万方数据库。入组标准为70岁以上;Garden Ⅰ或Ⅱ股骨颈骨折;螺钉内固定与关节置换术比较的研究。主要结果是再手术率。次要结果包括死亡率、术后并发症、髋关节Harris评分。由两位研究人员从纳入的研究中独立提取数据。应用STATA软件进行统计量合并。结果在901篇筛选的文章中,5篇文献符合入选标准,共有28591名患者（14296名接受关节置换术,14295名接受内固定治疗）。内固定组再手术率高于关节置换组（OR：0.02,95%CI：0.43~0.84）,差异具有统计学意义（Z=3.46,P=0.00）。两个治疗组之间的一年死亡风险、并发症及Harris评分没有显著差异。结论对于无移位的老年股骨颈骨折,关节置换术可降低再手术率,优于内固定治疗。对老年无移位股骨颈骨折行一期关节置换术具有合理性。

关键词: 关节置换术, 无移位股骨颈骨折, 老年, 内固定

CLC Number:

R681.5

LI Hong-bin, LIU Nan. Meta-analysis of the rationality of arthroplasty in the treatment of undisplaced femoral neck fracture[J]. Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery, 2020, 20(06): 766-770.

李洪彬, 刘楠. 关节置换术治疗老年无移位股骨颈骨折合理性Meta分析[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2020, 20(06): 766-770.

References

[1] Zhang BF, Wang PF, Huang H, et al.Interventions for treating displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in the elderly: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1):13103.
[2] 王树相,邱菊. 老年新鲜无移位型股骨颈骨折治疗的临床研究[J]. 中国实用医药,2010,5(29):35-36.
[3] Do LND, Kruke TM, Foss OA, et al.Reoperations and mortality in 383 patients operated with parallel screws for Garden I-II femoral neck fractures with up to ten years follow-up[J]. Injury. 2016, 47(12):2739-2742.
[4] 彭亨. 空心加压螺钉内固定与人工股骨头置换治疗高龄患者无移位股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[D]. 湖南师范大学,2019.
[5] 舒诗军,赫金辉,李晓旭. 经皮加压钢板与空心螺钉治疗老年无移位股骨颈骨折的比较[J]. 实用骨科杂志,2018,24(8):745-748.
[6] Gregersen M, Krogshede A, Brink O, et al.Prediction of reoperation of femoral neck fractures treated with cannulated screws in elderly patients[J]. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil, 2015, 6(4): 322-327.
[7] 蔡攀,尹志峰,张友忠,等. 经皮加压钢板与空心螺钉治疗老年无移位性股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中华创伤杂志,2018,34(1):46-50.
[8] Sjöholm P, Otten V, Wolf O, et al.Posterior and anterior tilt increases the risk of failure after internal fixation of Garden I and II femoral neck fracture[J].Acta Orthop, 2019, 90(6):537-541.
[9] 潘华,刘瀚忠,许冠伟,王清. 人工股骨头置换与加压螺钉内固定治疗老年无移位股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2017,11(1):59-63.
[10] 翟生,白靖平. 内固定与髋关节置换术治疗老年有移位股骨颈骨折的系统评价[J]. 新疆医科大学学报,2006, (2):137-140+144.
[11] Bartels S, Gjertsen JE, Frihagen F, et al.High failure rate after internal fixation and beneficial outcome after arthroplasty in treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in patients between 55 and 70 years[J]. Acta Orthop, 2018, 89(1):53-58.
[12] Moerman S, Mathijssen NMC, Niesten DD, et al.More complications in uncemented compared to cemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomized controlled trial of 201 patients with one year follow-up[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2017, 18:169.
[13] Parker MJ, White A, Boyle A.Fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for undisplaced intracapsular hip fractures[J]. Injury, 2008, 39(7):791-795.
[14] Lu Q, Tang G, Zhao X, Guo S, et al.Hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation in super-aged patients with undisplaced femoral neck fractures: a 5-year follow-up of randomized controlled trial[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2017, 137(1):27-35.
[15] Hui AC, Anderson GH, Choudhry R, et al.Internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty for undisplaced fractures of the femoral neck in octogenarians[J]. Bone Joint Surg Br, 1994, 76(6):891-894.
[16] Lin JC, Liang WM.Outcomes after fixation for undisplaced femoral neck fracture compared to hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture among the elderly[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2015, 16:199.
[17] Dolatowski FC, Frihagen F, Bartels S, et al.Screw Fixation Versus Hemiarthroplasty for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Bone Joint Surg Am, 2019, 101(2):136-144.
[18] Huang TW, Chang CH, Chang FC, et al.Results of Conversion from Failed Austin-Moore Hemiarthroplasty to Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Octogenarian Patients with Advanced Acetabular Erosion: A Minimum of 5 Years of Follow-Up[J].Biomed Res Int, 2019, 2019:7814602.
[19] Sprague S, Schemitsch EH, Swiontkowski M, et al.Factors Associated With Revision Surgery After Internal Fixation of Hip Fractures[J]. Orthop Trauma, 2018, 32(5):223-230.
[20] Nyholm AM, Palm H, Sandholdt H, et al.Risk of reoperation within 12 months following osteosynthesis of a displaced femoral neck fracture is linked mainly to initial fracture displacement while risk of death may be linked to bone quality: a cohort study from Danish Fracture Database[J]. Acta Orthop, 2020, 91(1):1-75.
[21] Kim JW, Kim DH, Jang EC, et al.Mortality and its risk factors in nonagenarians after hip fractures[J]. Orthop Sci, 2019, 24(5):850-854.
[22] Ma HH, Chou TA, Tsai SW, et al.Outcomes of internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for elderly patients with an undisplaced femoral neck fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Orthop Surg Res, 2019, 14(1):320.
[23] Zhang BF, Wang PF, Huang H, et al.Interventions for treating displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in the elderly: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1):13103.
[24] Okike K, Udogwu UN, Isaac M, et al.Not All Garden-I and II Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly Should Be Fixed: Effect of Posterior Tilt on Rates of Subsequent Arthroplasty[J]. Bone Joint Surg Am, 2019, 101(20):1852-1859.
[25] Feng JE, Novikov D, Chen K, et al.Up to 18-Year Follow-Up Wear Analysis of a First-Generation Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty[J]. Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(10):3325-3328.