Research status and progresses in the patients satisfactory assessment after total joint arthroplasty

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2013.06.027

Abstract

Abstract: 【Abstract】 Objective To analyze the current status and progress of patient satisfaction assessment after total joint arthroplasty. Methods A search of recent articles of patient satisfaction assessment after total joint arthroplasty, and analysis on the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the latest research progress were carried out. Results So far, there is still no gold standard in the patient satisfaction assessment after total joint arthroplasty. However, most research results tend to combine the specific questionnaires and generic questionnaires in the satisfaction assessment after total joint arthroplasty. Conclusion In recent years, more and more orthopedists are paying attention to the selection of appropriate patient satisfaction assessment methods after total joint arthroplasty. A comprehensive result can be obtained by the combination of specific questionnaires and generic questionnaires in patient satisfaction assessment after total joint arthroplasty.

Key words: Arthroplasty, Outcome assessment, Questionnaires, Patient satisfaction

摘要： 【摘要】目的探讨人工关节置换术后病人满意度调查现状及进展。方法查阅近年人工关节置换术后病人满意度调查的最新文献,对于人工关节置换术后病人满意度调查的方法的有效性、可靠性、响应性方面的最新研究进展进行综合分析。结果目前对于关节置换术后病人满意度评价方法仍然没有广泛接受的金标准,但多数研究结果倾向于将特定调查问卷和通用调查问卷结合使用。结论近年来人工关节置换术患者满意度评估受到越来越多骨科医生的重视,采用把特定调查问卷和通用调查问卷结合使用或许能够获得一个更全面的关节置换术患者术后满意度评价结果。

关键词: 关节置换术, 结果评估, 调查问卷, 患者满意度

CLC Number:

R684

Zheng Shicong, Li Shiyuan, Zhang Yi. Research status and progresses in the patients satisfactory assessment after total joint arthroplasty[J]. Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery, 2013, 13(06): 561-566.

郑仕聪李世渊张毅. 人工关节置换术后病人满意度调查研究进展[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2013, 13(06): 561-566.

References

[1] March LM, Bagga H. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis in Australia. Med J Aust, 2004, 180 (5 Suppl): 6–10. [2] Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, et al. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2004, 86: 963–974. [3] Towheed TE, Hochberg MC. Health-related quality of life after total hip replacement. Semin Arthritis Rheum, 1996, 26: 483–491. [4] Cédric Baumann, Anne Christine Rat, Georges Osnowycz, et al. Satisfaction with care after total hip or knee replacement predicts self-perceived health status after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2009, 10: 150. [5] Wylde V, Blom AW, Whitehouse SL, et al. Patient-reported outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty: comparison of midterm results. J Arthroplasty, 2009, 24(2): 210-216. [6] Sitzia J, Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med, 1997, 45(12):1829-1843. [7] Dunbar MJ. Subjective outcomes after knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl, 2001, 72(301): 1-63. [8] Anakwe RE, Jenkins PJ, Moran M. Predicting dissatisfaction after total hip arthro-plasty: a study of 850 patients. J Arthroplasty, 2011, 26(2): 209-213. [9] Janse AJ, Gemke RJBJ, Uiterwaal CSPM, et al. Quality of life: patients and doctors don’t always agree: a meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol, 2004, 57(7): 653-661. [10] Cleeland CS, Gonin R, Hatfield AK, et al. Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer. N Engl J Med, 1994, 330: 592-596. [11] Bland J, Altman D. Statistics notes: cronbach’s alpha. BMJ, 1997, 314(22): 572. [12] Sitzia J. How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. Int J Qual Health Care, 1999, 11(4): 319-28. [13] Bellamy N. The WOMAC Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis Indices: development, validation, globalization and influence on the development of the AUSCAN Hand.Osteoarthritis Indices. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2005, 23(5 Suppl 39): S148-S153. [14] Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, et al. Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Who is Satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(1): 57-63. [15] Merle-Vincent F, Couris CM, Schott A-M, et al. Factors predicting patient satisfaction 2 years after total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Joint Bone Spine, 2011, 78(4): 383-386. [16] Anakwe RE, Jenkins PJ, Moran M. Predicting dissatisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 850 patients. J Arthroplasty, 2011, 26(2): 209 -213. [17] Clement ND, MacDonald D, Howie CR, et al. The outcome of primary total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients aged 80 years or more. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2011, 93(9): 1265-1270. [18] Scott CEH, Howie CR, MacDonald D, et al. Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2010, 92(9): 1253-1258. [19] Arden NK, Kiran A, Judge A, et al. What is a good patient reported outcome after total hip replacement? Osteoarthr Cartil, 2011, 19(2): 155- 162. [20] Gandhi R, Davey JR, Mahomed NN. Predicting patient dissatisfaction following joint replacement surgery. J Rheumatol, 2008, 35(12): 2415-2418. [21] Brander V, Gondek S, Martin E, et al. Pain and depression influence outcome 5 years after knee replacement surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2007, 464: 21-26. [22] Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, et al. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol, 2002, 29(6): 1273-1279. [23] Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, et al. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand, 2000, 71(3): 262-267. [24] Rolfson O, K?rrholm J, Dahlberg LE, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2011, 93(7): 867-75. [25] Mariconda M, Galasso O, Costa GG, et al. Quality of life and functionality after total hip arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2011, 12(1): 222. [26] Thorsell M, Holst P, Hyldahl HC, et al. Pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study comparing local infiltration anesthesia and epidural anesthesia. Orthopedics, 2010, 33(2): 75-80. [27] Smith TO, Blake V, Hing CB. Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. Int Orthop, 2011, 35(2): 173- 184. [28] Burnett RSJ, Boone JL, Mccarthy KP, et al. A prospective randomized clinical trial of patellar resurfacing and nonresurfacing in bilateral TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2007, 464: 65-72. [29] Nizard RS, Biau D, Porcher R, et al. A meta-analysis of patellar replacement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2005, 432: 196-203. [30] Mayman D. Resurfacing versus not resurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty 8-to 10-year results. J Arthroplasty, 2003, 18(5): 541-545. [31] Burnett RS, Haydon CM, Rorabeck CH, et al. The John Insall Award: patella resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, 428: 12-25. [32] Mancuso CA, Salvati EA, Johanson NA, et al. Patients’ expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 1997, 12(4): 387–396. [33] Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, et al. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2007, 89(4): 477-480. [34] Russell TG, Buttrum P, Wootton R, et al. Rehabilitation after total knee replacement via low-bandwidth telemedicine: the patient and therapist experience. J Telemed Telecare, 2004, 10(Suppl 1):85-7. [35] Pour AE, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, et al. Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty: what role does patient preconditioning play? J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2007, 89(9): 1920 -1927. [36] Bourne RB, Chesworth B, Davis A, et al. Comparing patient outcomes after THA and TKA: Is there a difference? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(2): 542-546. [37] Mahomed N, Gandhi R, Daltroy L, et al. The self-administered patient satisfaction scale for primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthritis, 2011,2011:591253. [38] Alviar MJ, Olver J, Brand C, et al. Do patient-reported outcome measures in hip and knee arthroplasty rehabilitation have robust measurement attributes? A systematic review. J Rehabil Med, 2011, 43: 572-583. [39] Impellizzeri F, Mannion A, Leunig M, et al. Comparison of the reliability, responsiveness, and construct validity of 4 different questionnaires for evaluating outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2011, 26(6): 861-869. [40] Kl?ssbo M, Larsson E, Mannevik E. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. An extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Scand J Rheumatol, 2003, 32: 46-51. [41] Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, et al. Validation of the Spanish version of the WOMAC questionnaire for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol, 2002, 21: 466-471. [42] Quintana JM, Escobar A, Bilbao A, et al. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2005, 13: 1076-1083. [43] Soininen JV, Paavolainen PO, Gronblad MA, et al. Validation study of a Finnish version of the Western Ontario and McMasters University osteoarthritis index. Hip Int, 2008, 18: 108-111. [44] Devlin NJ, Appleby J. Getting the most out of PROMs: putting health outcomes at the heart of NHS decision-making. London: The King’s Fund; 2010:12-14. [45] Brazier J, Harper R, Munro J, et al. Generic and condition-specific outcome mea-sures for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology (Oxford), 1999, 38: 870-877. [46] Xie F, Li SC, Goeree R, et al. Validation of Chinese Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in patients scheduled for total knee replacement. Qual Life Res, 2008, 17: 595-601. [47] Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klassbo M, et al. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)—validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskel Disord, 2003, 4: 10. [48] Ornetti P, Parratte S, Gossec L, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) in hip osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2010, 18: 522-529. [49] Xie F, Li SC, Roos EM, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Singapore English and Chinese versions of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) in Asians with knee osteoarthritis in Singapore. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2006, 14: 1098-1103. [50] De Groot IB, Favejee MM, Reijman M, et al. The Dutch version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score: a validation study. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2008, 6: 16. [51] Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br], 1996, 78: 185-190. [52] Gosens T, Hoefnagels NH, de Vet RC, et al. The “Oxford Heup Score”: the translation and validation of a questionnaire into Dutch to evaluate the results of total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop, 2005, 76: 204-211. [53] Naal FD, Sieverding M, Impellizzeri FM, et al. Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted German Oxford Hip Score. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009, 467: 952-957. [54] Haverkamp D, Breugem SJ, Sierevelt IN, et al. Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire for knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop, 2005, 76: 347-352. [55] John E. Ware, Kristin K. Snow, Mark Kosinski, et al. SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston: New England Medical Center the Health Institute, 1993, 11-121 [56] Perneger TV, Leplège A, Etter JF, et al. Validation of a French-language version of theMOS36-ItemShort Form Health Survey(SF-36) in young healthy adults. J Clin Epidemiol, 1995, 48: 1051-1060. [57] Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol, 1993, 46: 1417-1432. [58] Gandek B, Ware JE Jr. Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol, 1998, 51: 953-959. [59] Singh J, Sloan JA, Johanson NA. Challenges With Health-related Quality of Life Assessment in Arthroplasty Patients: Problems and Solutions. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2010, 18(2): 72–82. [60] Rolfson O, Rothwell A, Sedrakyan A, et al. Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Context of Different Levels of Data. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2011, 93 Suppl 3(E):66-71. [61] Ware JE, Kosinski M. The SF-36 health survey (Version 2) technical note. Boston, MA: Health Assessment Lab, 1997. 27. [62] Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE. How to score version two of the SF-36 health survey. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric, Incorporated, 2000:17. [63] Ostendorf M, van Stel HF, Buskens E, et al. Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement: a comparison of five instruments of health status. Bone Joint Surg, 2004, 86: 801-808. [64] Wright JG, Young NL. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol, 1997, 50: 239-246. [65] Busija L, Osborne RH, Nilsdotter A, et al. Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2008, 6: 55. [66] Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, et al. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2007, 15: 273-280. [67] Bombardier C, Melfi C, Paul J, et al. Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement surgery. Med Care, 1995 Apr;33(4 Suppl): 131–144. [68] Brazier J, Harper R, Munro J, et al. Generic and condition-specific outcome measures for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology (Oxford), 1999, 38: 870-877. [69] Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, et al. Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty: results of a survey of 3600 patients from The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg [Br], 2001, 83: 339-344. [70] Busija L, Osborne RH, Nilsdotter A, et al. Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2008, 6: 55. [71] 田斐, 高建民, 郭海涛,等. 欧洲五维度健康量表(EQ-5D)研究与应用概况. 卫生经济研究, 2007, 9: 42-44. [72] Euro Qol Group. Euro Qol-A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 1990 Dec, 16(3): 199-208. [73] Jones CA, Beaupre LA, Johnston DW, et al. Total joint arthroplasties: current concepts of patient outcomes after surgery. Rheum Dis Clin North Am, 2007, 33: 71-86. [74] Jones CA, Pohar S. Health-related quality of life after total joint arthroplasty: a scoping review. Clin Geriatr Med, 2012 Aug, 28(3): 395-429.