欢迎访问《岭南现代临床外科》官方网站,今天是

岭南现代临床外科 ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (01): 98-102.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2022.01.018

• 论著与临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

21例颈椎前路手术的加速康复外科理念应用体会

何旭辉1,2, 郑潮顺2, 郭跃跃2, 张隆盛3, 邢泽华2, 林本丹4,*   

  1. 1.汕头大学医学院,广东汕头515063;
    2.揭阳市人民医院骨外二科,广东揭阳 522081;
    3.揭阳市人民医院麻醉科,广东揭阳522081;
    4.汕头市中心医院骨科,广东汕头515031
  • 通讯作者: *林本丹,Email: zxyylbd@sina.com

Implication of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery

HE Xu-hui1,2, ZHENG Chao-shun2, GUO Yue-yue2, ZHANG Long-sheng3, XING Ze-hua2, LIN ben-dan4   

  1. 1. Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong 515063;
    2. Department of Orthopedics, Jieyang People hospital;
    3. Department of anesthesiology, Jieyang People hospital;
    4. Department of Orthopedics, Shantou Central hospital, Guangdong 515063, China
  • Received:2022-01-07 Online:2022-03-17 Published:2022-03-17
  • Contact: LIN Ben-dan, zxyylbd@sina.com

摘要: 目的 探索加速康复围手术期管理方法在颈椎前路手术中的作用。方法 回顾分析2019年7月至2021年6月我科收治的42例颈椎病患者,其中加速康复组和传统组各21例,比较两组患者围手术期资料(手术时间、出血量、引流放置时间、离床活动时间、术后住院时间)、临床疗效、吞咽功能。结果 两组基线资料差异无明显统计学意义(P>0.05)。在围手术期资料方面,加速康复组手术时间、术中出血量与传统组无明显差异(P>0.05),而引流管放置时间、术后离床活动时间、术后住院时间均较传统组短(P<0.05)。在临床疗效方面,两组术后1天、1月、6月VAS评分及术后1月、6月JOA评分均较术前明显改善(P<0.05),加速康复组术后1天VAS评分优于传统组(P<0.05),其余时点及VAS评分、JOA评分两组间无明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。在吞咽功能评分方面,加速康复组在术后1天、术后1月轻度及以下吞咽困难比例较传统组高,中度吞咽困难患者比例较低(P<0.05),而术后6月两组吞咽困难评分差异无明显统计学意义(P>0.05)。在术后并发症方面,加速康复组出现1例皮肤浅层感染,2例尿潴留,传统组出现1例肺部感染,经过保守治疗后好转,无再次手术患者,无其他重大并发症。结论 加速康复理念运用于颈椎前路手术中,可改善围手术期疗效,缩短住院时间,有利于提高患者手术体验。

关键词: 加速康复理念, 颈椎前路手术, 脊髓型颈椎病, 神经根型颈椎病

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of ERAS protocol in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery. Methods We retrospectively analyze the clinical data of 42 patients with cervical Spondylosis underwent surgical treatment from July 2019 to June 2021. The patients were distributed to observation group and control group by whether their perioperative management were ERAS protocol. The perioperative data (operation time, estimated blood loss, drainage time, postoperative bed time, postoperative hospital staying time), clinical effect score and swallowing function were compared between two groups. Results The baseline data were comparable between two groups (P>0.05). For perioperative clinical data, the operation time and estimated blood loss were comparable between two groups, while the drainage time, postoperative bed time and postoperative hospital staying time in the ERAS group were shorter (P<0.05). For clinical effect score, the VAS scores of one day, one month, six months postoperative and the JOA score of one month, six months postoperative were better than the scores preoperative (P<0.05). Only the VAS scores one day postoperative of the ERAS group were better, the other time VAS and JOA scores were comparable between two groups (P>0.05). For swallowing function, the ERAS groups has better score one day, one month postoperative (P<0.05), while the score 6 months postoperative were not statistically different (P>0.05. For postoperative complications, one pulmonary infection and two urinary retention happened in the ERAS group and one skin infection in the conventional group which could be cured conservatively. No patients required reoperation or had other severe complication. Conclusion Implication of ERAS in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery can improve clinical effect, shorter hospital staying time and improve satisfaction rates.

Key words: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery, cervical spondylitic myelopathy, cervical spondylitic radiculopathy

中图分类号: