逆行肾内手术治疗直径2~3 cm肾结石的临床应用

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2024.02.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨逆行肾内手术（RIRS）治疗直径2~3 cm肾结石的临床应用。方法选取2022年1月到2023年3月我院诊治的直径2~3 cm肾结石患者80例,根据手术方式的不同分为观察组（逆行肾内手术RIRS组,n=40）和对照组（经皮肾镜碎石术PCNL组,n=40）。比较两组患者一般情况和结石特征、术中指标及术后恢复情况。结果两组患者各项一般情况数据和结石特征比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;RIRS组患者血红蛋白下降量低于PCNL组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,其余围手术期数据比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;RIRS组患者术后住院时间、总并发症低于PCNL组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;术后一个月,RIRS组结石清除34例（85.00%）,PCNL组患者结石清除36例（90.00%）,两组结石清除率比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论对于直径2~3 cm的较大肾结石患者采用输尿管软镜碎石术与经皮肾镜碎石术的手术时间、结石清除率、引起术后PCT的升高方面相当,输尿管软镜碎石术患者出血更少,恢复更快,术后住院时间更短,并发症发生率更低。

关键词: 肾结石, 逆行肾内手术, 经皮肾镜碎石术, 血红蛋白, 降钙素原

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical application of retrograde intrarenal surgery （RIRS） in the treatment of kidney stones measuring 2-3 cm in diameter. Methods A total of 80 patients with kidney stones with a diameter of 2-3 cm treated in our hospital from January 2022 to March 2023 were selected and divided into observation group （retrograde intrarenal surgery RIRS group, n=40） and control group （percutaneous nephrolithotripsis PCNL group, n=40） according to different surgical methods. The general condition, stone characteristics, intraoperative indexes and postoperative recovery of the two groups were compared. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in general condition data and stone characteristics （P>0.05）. The decrease of hemoglobin in RIRS group was lower than that in PCNL group, the difference was statistically significant （P<0.05）, but there was no statistically significant difference in other perioperative data （P>0.05）. The length of hospital stay and total complications in RIRS group were lower than those in PCNL group, and the differences were statistically significant （P<0.05）. One month after surgery, 34 patients （85.00%） in the RIRS group and 36 patients （90.00%） in the PCNL group were cleared of stone, and there was no significant difference in stone clearance between the two groups （P>0.05）. Conclusion The use of ureteral flexible lithotripsy in patients with larger renal stones of 2-3 cm in diameter is comparable to percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in terms of operative time, stone clearance, and causing postoperative elevation of PCT. Patients with ureteral soft lithotripsy have less bleeding, faster recovery, shorter postoperative hospital stay and lower complication rate.

Key words: kidney stone, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, hemoglobin, procalcitonin

中图分类号:

R692.4

周晓波, 李茂章. 逆行肾内手术治疗直径2~3 cm肾结石的临床应用[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2024, 24(02): 116-120.

ZHOU Xiao-bo, LI Mao-zhang. Clinical application of retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of kidney stones measuring 2~3 cm in diameter[J]. Lingnan Modern Clinics In Surgery, 2024, 24(02): 116-120.

参考文献

[1] Akram M, Jahrreiss V, Skolarikos A, et al.Urological Guidelines for Kidney Stones: Overview and Comprehensive Update[J]. J Clin Med, 2024, 13(4): 1114.
[2] Fernández Alcalde ÁA, Ruiz Hernández M, Gómez Dos Santos V, et al. Comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of 2 and 3cm renal lithiasis[J]. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed), 2019, 43(3): 111-117.
[3] Xuan H, Du Z, Xia L, et al.Comparison of outcomes between flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of upper calyceal calculi larger than 2 cm[J]. BMC Urol, 2022, 22(1): 183.
[4] Zeng G, Zhu W, Li J, et al.The comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for stones larger than 2 cm in patients with a solitary kidney: a matched-pair analysis[J]. World J Urol, 2015, 33(8): 1159-1164.
[5] Zhang Y, Li J, Jiao JW, Tian Y.Comparative outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for pediatric kidney stones larger than 2 cm[J]. Int J Urol, 2021, 28(6): 650-655.
[6] Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience[J]. Ann Surg, 2009, 250(2): 187-196.
[7] Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, et al.Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I[J]. J Urol, 2016, 196(4): 1153-1160.
[8] 李柳林, 张扬, 马隆, 等. 影响输尿管软镜碎石手术一期结石清除率及安全性的临床因素研究[J]. 国际泌尿系统杂志, 2024, 44(2): 211-215.
[9] Grasso M, Conlin M, Bagley D.Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor Staghorn calculi[J]. J Urol, 1998, 160(2): 346-351.
[10] Li Z, Zhang HR, Chen WD, et al.Comparison of efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 2~3 cm renal calculi in women: a single-center study[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2023, 27(22): 11115-11121.
[11] 李思宁, 朱砂, 苏劲, 等. 输尿管软镜碎石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径2~4 cm肾结石的临床疗效对比[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2023, 40(4): 750-754.
[12] Inoue T, Okada S, Hamamoto S, et al.Current trends and pitfalls in endoscopic treatment of urolithiasis[J]. Int J Urol, 2018, 25(2): 121-133.
[13] Donaldson JF, Ruhayel Y, Skolarikos A, et al.Treatment of Bladder Stones in Adults and Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Behalf of the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guideline Panel[J]. Eur Urol, 2019, 76(3): 352-367.
[14] Kang SK, Cho KS, Kang DH, et al.Systematic review and meta-analysis to compare success rates of retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2 cm: An update[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(49): e9119.
[15] Wilhelm K, Hein S, Adams F, et al.Ultra-mini PCNL versus flexible ureteroscopy: a matched analysis of analgesic consumption and treatment-related patient satisfaction in patients with renal stones 10-35 mm[J]. World J Urol, 2015, 33(12): 2131-2136.
[16] Reinhart K, Meisner M, Brunkhorst FM.Markers for Sepsis Diagnosis: What is Useful?[J]. Crit Care Clin, 2006, 22(3): 503-519.