腹腔镜肾癌根治术后切口感染的手术室相关因素分析及术前NLR、PLR的意义

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2022.03.011

岭南现代临床外科 ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (03): 272-275.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2022.03.011

腹腔镜肾癌根治术后切口感染的手术室相关因素分析及术前NLR、PLR的意义

潘佳仁^1,2, 潘华锋², 王平^1,*

1.浙江大学附属第一医院泌尿外科,浙江杭州 310006;
2.中国科学院大学宁波华美医院泌尿外科,浙江宁波 315000

通讯作者: * 王平,Email：wpmnwk@126.com
基金资助:
中国科学院大学宁波华美基金（2020HMKY40）

Correlation between operation room associated risk factors and wound infection after laparoscopic radical resection of renal carcinoma and the significance of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

PAN Jia-ren^1,2, PAN Hua-feng², WANG Ping¹

1. Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University Medical College, Hangzhou 310006, China;
2. Department of Urology, HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315010, China

Received:2021-12-26 Online:2022-06-20 Published:2022-08-09
Contact: WANG Ping, wpmnwk@126.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨腹腔镜肾癌根治术后手术切口感染的手术室相关因素分析及术前血清中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值（NLR）及血小板与淋巴细胞比值（PLR）的意义。方法选取2013年12月~2021年12月在中国科学院大学宁波华美医院泌尿外科861例行腹腔镜肾癌根治术患者为研究对象,手术后合并切口感染的患者作为研究组,手术后未并发切口感染的患者作为对照组。同时比较研究组和对照组患者血清NLR及PLR水平,统计分析手术后发生切口感染的患者的手术室相关因素。结果非层流手术室、手术时间>3 h、术中低体温（P<0.05）是手术后切口感染的独立危险因素;研究组血清NLR及PLR水平高于对照组;血清NLR及PLR联合诊断切口感染敏感度及特异度较高。结论非层流手术室、手术时间>3 h、术中低体温是腹腔镜肾癌根治术后切口感染发生的危险因素,感染组患者血清NLR及PLR水平,可作为诊断术后感染及评估病情的重要生物学指标。

关键词: 腹腔镜肾癌根治术, 手术切口感染, 危险因素, NLR, PLR

Abstract: Objective To analyze of risk factors of wound infection after laparoscopic radical resection of renal carcinoma and the significance of preoperative NLR and PLR. Methods A total of 861 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of renal carcinoma in our hospital from December 2013 to December 2021 were enrolled in this study, in which patients with wound infection were used as the study group, and patients without wound infection were used as the control group. Serum NLR and PLR between study group and control group were compared, and operation room risk factors of patients with wound infection after surgery were statistically analyzed. Results Risk factors included non-laminar flow operating room, operation time >; 3 h and intraoperative hypothermia （P<; 0.05）; the levels of NLR and PLR showed significantly difference in the two groups, serum NLR combined with PLR of the area under curve （AUC） was greater than the single index, which was 0.837, the best diagnostic sensitivity was 80.2%, and the specificity was 85.4%. Conclusion Non-laminar flow operating room, operation time >; 3 h and intraoperative hypothermiawere risk factors for wound infection. Preoperative serum NLR and PLR were closely correlated with wound infection, which can be used as an important biological indicators for the diagnosis of postoperative wound infection.

Key words: laparoscopic radical resection of renal carcinoma, wound infection, risk factors, NLR, PLR

中图分类号:

R737.11

潘佳仁, 潘华锋, 王平. 腹腔镜肾癌根治术后切口感染的手术室相关因素分析及术前NLR、PLR的意义[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2022, 22(03): 272-275.

PAN Jia-ren, PAN Hua-feng, WANG Ping. Correlation between operation room associated risk factors and wound infection after laparoscopic radical resection of renal carcinoma and the significance of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio[J]. Lingnan Modern Clinics In Surgery, 2022, 22(03): 272-275.

参考文献

[1] Chugh S, Pietropaolo A, Montanari E, et al.Predictors of urinary infections and urosepsis after ureteroscopy for stone disease: a systematic review from eau section of urolithiasis (EULIS)[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2020, 21(4): 16.
[2] Mayer WA.Commentary in response to BMC Urology publication entitled “Infection-related hospitalization following ureteroscopic stone treatment: results from a surgical collaborative”[J]. BMC Urol, 2021, 21(1): 150.
[3] de Vermandois JAR, Cochetti G, Zingaro MD, et al. Evaluation of Surgical Site Infection in Mini-invasive Urological Surgery[J]. Open Med (Wars), 2019, 14: 711-718.
[4] Wang J, Zhang F, Jiang F, et al.Distribution and reference interval establishment of neutral-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in Chinese healthy adults[J]. J Clin Lab Anal, 2021, 35(9): e23935.
[5] Asik Z.The Role of the NLR and PLR in Urinary Tract Infection[J]. Clin Lab, 2021, 67(10).
[6] BAN KA, Minei JP, Laronga C, et al.American College of Surgeons and Surgical Infection Society: Surgical Site Infection Guidelines, 2016 Update[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2017, 224(1): 59-74.
[7] Waltz PK, Zuckerbraun BS.Surgical site infections and associated operative characteristics[J]. Surg Infect, 2017, 18(4): 447-450.
[8] Strömdahl AC, Ignatowicz L, Petruk G, et al.Peptide-coated polyurethane material reduces wound infection and inflammation[J]. Acta biomater, 2021, 128: 314-331.
[9] Langvatn H, Schrama JC, Cao G, et al.Operating room ventilation and the risk of revision due to infection after total hip arthroplasty: assessment of validated data in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register[J]. J Hosp infect, 2020, 105(2): 216-224.
[10] Frisch NB, Pepper AM, Jildeh TR, et al.Intraoperative hypothermia during surgical fixation of hip fractures[J]. Orthopedics, 2016, 39(6): e1170-e1177.
[11] O′Hara LM, Thom KA, Preas MA. Update to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection (2017): A summary, review, and strategies for implementation[J]. Am J Infect Control, 2018, 46(6): 602-609.
[12] Pusta A, Tertiș M, Cristea C, Mirel S.Wearable sensors for the detection of biomarkers for wound infection[J]. Biosensors, 2021, 12(1):1.
[13] Tee MC, Chen L, Franko J, et al.Effect of wound protectors on surgical site infection in patients undergoing whipple procedure[J]. HPB (Oxford), 2021, 23(8): 1185-1195.
[14] Kobayashi Y, Inose H, Ushio S, et al.Body mass index and modified glasgow prognostic score are useful predictors of surgical site infection after spinal instrumentation surgery: a consecutive series[J]. Spine, 2020, 45(3): e148-e154.
[15] Djeu JY, Serbousek D, Blanchard DK.Release of tumor necrosis factor by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes[J]. Blood, 1990, 76(7): 1405-1409.
[16] Shau HY, Kim A.Suppression of lymphokine-activated killer induction by neutrophils[J]. J Immunol, 1988, 141(12): 4395-4402.
[17] Rotem R, Erenberg M, Rottenstreich M, et al.Early prediction of post cesarean section infection using simple hematological biomarkers: A case control study[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2020, 245: 84-88.

腹腔镜肾癌根治术后切口感染的手术室相关因素分析及术前NLR、PLR的意义

Correlation between operation room associated risk factors and wound infection after laparoscopic radical resection of renal carcinoma and the significance of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	邹军, 杨淑婷, 王侃, 赵子然. 基于倾向性评分匹配方法的结肠癌根治术后发生吻合口漏的围术期相关危险因素分析[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2021, 21(05): 551-555.
[2]	詹尚欣, 刘鑫斌, 古旭莹, 江水华, 陈锭光, 张琳. 腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后并发血清肿的相关因素及防治策略探析[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2020, 20(06): 715-718.
[3]	李宣娜, 陈尚祥, 练国达, 陈少杰, 黄开红. 240例胰腺癌肝转移临床特征及预后分析[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2020, 20(02): 151-154.
[4]	王泽亮, 胡泽民, 何泳铸, 叶少炜. 影响肝移植术后早期移植物功能障碍的危险因素分析[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2020, 20(02): 180-183.
[5]	钟思权，陈伟强. 肝移植术后感染的流行病学特征及危险因素[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2020, 20(01): 108-112.
[6]	张康，顾利虎，莫宇轩，徐洪鎏，陈平. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术术后十二指肠残端瘘的危险因素分析[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2020, 20(01): 1-7.
[7]	黄灿彬1，戎祯祥1，2*. 预防性肠造口还纳术后切口疝的发生率、危险因素及预防进展[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2019, 19(06): 767-775.
[8]	李莉. 急性肿瘤溶解综合征在急诊科的认识和处理[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2019, 19(06): 653-657.
[9]	田华开，宗振*. 胃肠间质瘤术后复发影响因素分析及治疗决策展望[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2019, 19(06): 658-661.
[10]	崔冠华，练涛峰，樊亮，杜酉寅，周鸿杰，陈锋顺，黎惠婷. 影响新生儿坏死性小肠结肠炎发生的危险因素及手术时机研究[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2019, 19(03): 264-267.
[11]	崔学江，冯权尧，胡明，黄益恒，杨云杰，赵振华. 合并原发性高血压肾结石的危险因素及与结石成分的关系[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2018, 18(05): 582-585.
[12]	潘丽芬. 骨科清洁切口手术部位感染的危险因素分析[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2018, 18(03): 367-371.
[13]	汤福鑫，陈双. 浅谈腹腔镜腹壁疝手术时发生肠切开的原因和处理方法[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2018, 18(01): 6-8.
[14]	孟诗雨，苏相飞，彭书崚. 异氟醚通过NLRP3炎性小体调控炎症微环境的研究[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2018, 18(01): 14-18.
[15]	张伟何秉超李柏坚. 东莞市人群中轴型脊柱关节病的相关危险因素及其髋关节受累比例[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2017, 17(05): 565-568.