腰方肌阻滞应用于剖宫产手术术后镇痛效果的系统评价

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2021.01.023

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的系统评价腰方肌阻滞应用于剖宫产手术术后镇痛的有效性和安全性。方法计算机检索PubMed、The Cochrane Library、Embase、中国生物医学数据库（CBM）、万方数据库、中国知网和维普网数据库,收集从建库到2020年4月所有关于腰方肌阻滞用于剖宫产手术术后镇痛效果的随机对照试验。由两位评价员独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,采用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果最终纳入10个随机对照试验,包括666例患者。Meta分析结果显示：与对照组相比,腰方肌阻滞能有效降低剖宫产患者术后24小时内阿片类药物的需求量（SMD=-1.63, 95%CI： -2.06, -1.20, P<0.00001）,同时降低术后24小时内PCA按压次数（SMD=-2.01, 95%CI： -2.35, -1.68, P<0.00001）,且不增加阿片类药物相关的并发症发生率。由于各研究间术后24小时静息和运动时VAS评分的高异质性,无法进行定量分析,我们仅对此结果进行了描述性分析。结论腰方肌阻滞用于剖宫产术术后镇痛,能降低术后阿片类药物用量,降低术后24小时PCA按压次数,在临床多模式镇痛的应用中有广泛前景。

关键词: 腰方肌阻滞, 剖宫产术, 术后镇痛, 随机对照试验, 系统评价

Abstract: Objective To systematically evaluate the effect of quadratus lumborum block （QLB） on the postoperative analgesia in puerperae undergoing cesarean section. Methods Databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, CBM, Wanfang Data, CNKI, VIP were searched to collect randomized controlled trials （RCTs） about QLB on the postoperative analgesia in puerperae undergoing cesarean section from inception to February 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 10 RCTs studies involving 666 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the control group, QLB could reduce the 24-hour opioid requirements （SMD=-1.63, 95%CI： -2.06, -1.20, P<0.00001）, lower the 24-hour PCA demands （SMD=-2.01, 95%CI： -2.35, -1.68, P<0.00001）, and there was no increase in the incidence of opioid-related complications. Several studies reported that QLB on the VAS score at rest and during movement at 24-hour, but quantitative analysis was not possible due to high heterogeneity, and we had conducted only a descriptive analysis of these results. Conclusion The use of QLB for postoperative analgesia in puerperae undergoing cesarean section could reduce the requirements of opioid analgesics, lower the 24-hour PCA demands. It has a widely prospect in the application of multimode analgesia in patients.

Key words: quadratus lumborum block, cesarean section, postoperative analgesia, randomized controlled trial, meta analysis

中图分类号:

R614

刘鉴, 杨桐, 尹晴. 腰方肌阻滞应用于剖宫产手术术后镇痛效果的系统评价[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2021, 21(01): 120-125.

LIU Jian, YANG Tong, YIN Qing. Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in puerperae undergoing cesarean section：A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Lingnan Modern Clinics In Surgery, 2021, 21(01): 120-125.

参考文献

[1] Karlstrom A, Engstrom-Olofsson R, Norbergh KG, et al.Postoperative pain after cesarean birth affects breastfeeding and infant care[J]. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, 2007, 36(5): 430-440.
[2] Dahl JB, Jeppesen IS, Jorgensen H, et al.Intraoperative and postoperative analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal opioids in patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia: a qualitative and quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. Anesthesiology,1999, 91(6): 1919-1927.
[3] Rawal N.Current issues in postoperative pain management[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2016, 33(3): 160-171.
[4] Ueshima H, Otake H, Lin JA.Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum block: an updated review of anatomy and techniques[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2017, 4(1): 275-287.
[5] Jin Z, Liu JX, LI R, et al.Single injection Quadratus Lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in adult surgical population: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2020, 62: 109715.
[6] 何明霞, 刘玉林. 腰方肌阻滞应用于腹部手术术后镇痛效果的系统评价[J]. 西南医科大学学报, 2019, 42(3): 223-228.
[7] Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al.The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials[J]. BMJ, 2011, 343: d5928.
[8] Tamura T, Yokota S, Ando M, et al.A triple-blinded randomized trial comparing spinal morphine with posterior quadratus lumborum block after cesarean section[J]. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2019, 40: 32-38.
[9] Blanco R, Ansari T, Girgis E.Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain after caesarean section: A randomised controlled trial[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2015, 32(11): 812-818.
[10] Blanco R, Ansari T, Riad W, et al.Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Pain After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2016, 41(6): 757-762.
[11] Krohg A, Ullensvang K, Rosseland LA, et al.The Analgesic Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. Anesth Analg, 2018, 126(2): 559-565.
[12] Salama ER.Ultrasound guided bilateral quadratus lumborum block vs. intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2020, 73(2): 121-128.
[13] Verma K, Malawat A, Jethava D, et al.Comparison of transversus abdominis plane block and quadratus lumborum block for post-caesarean section analgesia: A randomised clinical trial[J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2019, 63(10): 820-826.
[14] 王敏, 黄伟文, 谢林碧, 等. Ⅰ型入路腰方肌阻滞在剖宫产妇女术后镇痛效果的随机对照研究[J]. 广东医学, 2019, 40(12): 1795-1797.
[15] 蔡日生, 廖美娟, 仲吉英, 等, 超声引导腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌阻滞在剖宫产术后镇痛效果的随机对照研究[J]. 广东医学, 2019, 40(21): 3084-3087.
[16] 李刚, 买买提, 盖殿秀. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞在剖宫产术后镇痛中的效果比较[J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志, 2018, 39(4): 338-340.
[17] 余高锋, 金尚怡, 李会仁, 等. 腰方肌阻滞在剖宫产术后镇痛的效果评估[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2018, 34(15): 2567-2570.
[18] Granot M, Lowenstein L, Yarnitsky D, et al.Postcesarean section pain prediction by preoperative experimental pain assessment[J]. Anesthesiology, 2003, 98(6): 1422-1426.
[19] Strigo IA, Bushnell MC, Boivin M, et al.Psychophysical analysis of visceral and cutaneous pain in human subjects[J]. Pain, 2002, 97(3): 235-246.
[20] Blanco R. TAP block under ultrasound guidance: the description of a”non pops”technique [J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2007, 32(51): 130.(https://rapm.bmj.com/content/32/Suppl_1/130.2.abstract)
[21] Felfel MA. Ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum (TQL) block versus spinal morphine (SM) for pain relief after caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial [J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2018, 43(7): e207.(http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L624139900)
[22] Irwin R, Stanescu S, Buzaianu C, et al.Quadratus lumborum block for analgesia after caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Anaesthesia, 2020, 75(1): 89-95.
[23] Kang W, Lu D, Yang X, et al.Postoperative analgesic effects of various quadratus lumborum block approaches following cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Pain Res, 2019, 12: 2305-2312.
[24] Champaneria R, Shah L, Wilson MJ, et al.Clinical effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for pain relief after caesarean section: a meta-analysis[J]. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2016, 28: 45-60.
[25] Tamura T, Yokota S, Ito S, Shibata Y, et al.Local anesthetic spread into the paravertebral space with two types of quadratus lumborum blocks: a crossover volunteer study[J]. J Anesth, 2019, 33(1): 26-32.
[26] Nielsen TD, Moriggl B, Barckman J, et al.Cutaneous anaesthesia of hip surgery incisions with iliohypogastric and subcostal nerve blockade: a randomised trial[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2019, 63(1): 101-110.