基层医院开展TST治疗重度混合痔临床疗效与价值

doi:j.issn.1009-976X.2014.01.025

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【摘要】〓目的〓探讨选择性痔上粘膜切除术(TST)治疗重度混合痔在基层医院的临床应用效果及价值。方法〓对我院2011年1月~2012年6月收治的102例重度混合痔患者进行回顾性分析,102例患者根据意愿中,48例施行TST术,54例行传统外剥内扎术(M-M术),观察并比较两组患者的临床疗效。结果〓TST组的术中出血量及住院时间均少于M-M组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);TST组在术后疼痛、伤口水肿、排尿困难及复发率方面均优于M-M组;两组手术时间差异无统计学意义。结论〓由于TST是治疗重度混合痔的安全、有效、微创等特点,在基层医院开展患者能够接受。

关键词: TST, 外剥内扎术, 混合痔, 临床疗效

Abstract: 【Abstract】〓Objective〓To discuss the clinical effect and value of severe mixed hemorrhoids by Tissue-selecting Therapy stapler (TST) in primary hospital. Methods〓The clinical data of 102 severe mixed hemorrhoids patients from January 2011 to June 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Among 102 cases,.48 cases underwent TST procedure (TST group) and 54 received the traditional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (M-M group). The clinical efficacy of two groups were observed and compared..Results〓The patients in TST groups had less intraoperative blood loss and shorter hospitaliza-tion time when compared with M-M group (P<0.01). TST was also superior to M-M in postoperative pain, wound edema, dysuria and the recurrence rate. Operation time between two groups had no statistical significance(P>0.05). Conclusion〓TST is a safe, effective, minimally invasive operation method in the treatment of severe mixed hemorrhoids, it is suitable for primary hospital.

Key words: TST, Milligan-Morgan procedure, Mixed hemorrhoids, Curative effect

中图分类号:

R657.1⁺8

沈荣华许艾斌. 基层医院开展TST治疗重度混合痔临床疗效与价值[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2014, 14(01): 86-89.

Shen Ronghua,Xu Aibin. Analysis of curative effects on severe mixed hemorrhoids by TST treatment in primary hospital [J]. Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery, 2014, 14(01): 86-89.

[1]	陈海明, 许玲玲, 李建光, 罗惠明. 快速康复外科策略在环状混合痔围手术期治疗中的应用[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2022, 22(1): 75-78.
[2]	黄开越, 常冀杨, 李健, 徐闯, 曹恒, 王林伟, 张立超, 刘明廷. 体外冲击波治疗与手术治疗骨折延迟愈合临床疗效对比分析[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2020, 20(05): 588-592.
[3]	黄玉宝, 陈至玉, 周雄. RPH与PPH分别联合外剥内扎术治疗中重度混合痔高龄患者的手术分析[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2020, 20(04): 448-451.
[4]	黄思聪，刘学东，陈玉芳，吴华，李逸群*. 关节镜联合玻璃酸钠、硫酸氨基葡萄糖治疗膝骨关节炎疗效分析[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2019, 19(01): 71-75.
[5]	王勇，钟剑涛，刘水萍，姚进旺，邓群，黄伟香，杨柳娥. 弹力线套扎吻合器治疗混合痔 48 例临床观察[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2018, 18(02): 172-178.
[6]	徐凯，吴哲. 包皮过长的手术方式、经验和相关文献复习[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2018, 18(01): 70-74.
[7]	钟雄东. 复方聚乙二醇电解质散应用于混合痔患者术前肠道准备的临床观察[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2017, 17(04): 481-483.
[8]	曹恒刘明廷石辉刘康. 定制 3D 打印切模辅助全膝关节置换术的临床疗效分析[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2017, 17(02): 213-216.
[9]	郑柏生李锋生. 关节镜下清理术联合玻璃酸钠治疗膝骨性关节炎疗效新探[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2016, 16(02): 172-175.
[10]	陈玲卢敏何彩群封静许锦欢叶春媛. 超声刀与电刀运用于混合痔术后对比观察与护理[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2015, 15(05): 643-644.
[11]	邓国荣陈博艺李荣刘宁江李称才黄志杰钟其焕王振龙. 肝癌手术术前口服碳水化合物的安全性及疗效评估:随机对照研究[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2015, 15(03): 269-272.
[12]	陈诗强熊文华张光明. 跟骨锁定钢板内固定术治疗跟骨骨折的疗效观察[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2015, 15(01): 80-83.
[13]	钱斌王道猛吴俊张春阳. 全腔镜肺叶切除与开胸肺叶切除治疗早期肺癌的初步体会[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2014, 14(06): 665-667.
[14]	翁文锋董超雄何祖强. 输尿管气压弹道碎石术和微创经皮肾镜碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石的比较分析[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2013, 13(04): 329-331.
[15]	辜树勇杨逸峰林集荣潘锋锷. PPH术与传统外剥内扎术治疗痔的临床疗效对比[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2013, 13(02): 135-137.

基层医院开展TST治疗重度混合痔临床疗效与价值

Analysis of curative effects on severe mixed hemorrhoids by TST treatment in primary hospital

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics