输尿管气压弹道碎石术和微创经皮肾镜碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石的比较分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2013.04.018

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【摘要】目的探讨输尿管气压弹道碎石术和微创经皮肾镜碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石临床疗效。方法选取2009年月8月~2011年8月我院接受治疗的80例输尿管上段结石患者为研究对象,按照随机化原则将其随机分为观察组(40例)和对照组(40例)。观察组行输尿管气压弹道碎石术(TUPL),对照组行微创经皮肾镜碎石术,比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间,术后并发症发生率、碎石成功率、结石排出率。结果在碎石成功率、结石排出率这两项指标上,对照组要显著高于观察组(P<0.05),而在手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间,术后并发症发生率这四项指标的比较上观察组要显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 TUPL治疗输尿管上段结石的疗效较MIP稍差,但出血少、并发症低,临床医师多根据医院设备条件及结石位置、大小、输尿管通过性等不同情况选择适当的治疗方式。

关键词: 临床疗效, 输尿管气压弹道碎石术(TUPL), 微创经皮肾镜碎石术(MIP), 输尿管上段结石

Abstract:

【Abstract】Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between transureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy (TUPL) and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP) for treatment of upper ureteral stones..Methods From August 2009 to August 2011,.collected 80 patients with the upper ureteral stones in our hospital were divided into the control group (n=40) and the observation group (cases=40). TUPL was performed in observation group and MIP in control group. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization time, incidence rate of postoperative complications,.lithotriptic rate and the lithecbole rate were compared between two groups. Results The lithotrip rate and lithecbole rate in control group were higher than that in the observation group (P<0.05), but the operation time, the intraoperative blood loss, the hospitalization time and the complications in the observation group were significant lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion As for clinical effectiveness,.TUPL may be inferior to that of MIP for upper ureteral stones,.but TUPL have advanteges in the less bleeding and few complications..The clinical physician should choose a suitable method according to hospital equipment condition,calculus in location, size and ureteral situation.

Key words: Transureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy (TUPL), Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Upper ureteral stones, Clinical efficacy

中图分类号:

R693+.4

翁文锋董超雄何祖强. 输尿管气压弹道碎石术和微创经皮肾镜碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石的比较分析[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2013, 13(04): 329-331.

Weng Wenfeng,Dong Chaoxiong,.He Zuqiang. Comparison between the transureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of upper ureteral stones[J]. Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery, 2013, 13(04): 329-331.

[1]	黄开越, 常冀杨, 李健, 徐闯, 曹恒, 王林伟, 张立超, 刘明廷. 体外冲击波治疗与手术治疗骨折延迟愈合临床疗效对比分析[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2020, 20(05): 588-592.
[2]	李航，谢交弟，陈泽波，杨尚琪. 腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术治疗输尿管上段结石的效果评价[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2019, 19(05): 580-583.
[3]	黄思聪，刘学东，陈玉芳，吴华，李逸群*. 关节镜联合玻璃酸钠、硫酸氨基葡萄糖治疗膝骨关节炎疗效分析[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2019, 19(01): 71-75.
[4]	徐凯，吴哲. 包皮过长的手术方式、经验和相关文献复习[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2018, 18(01): 70-74.
[5]	曹恒刘明廷石辉刘康. 定制 3D 打印切模辅助全膝关节置换术的临床疗效分析[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2017, 17(02): 213-216.
[6]	郑柏生李锋生. 关节镜下清理术联合玻璃酸钠治疗膝骨性关节炎疗效新探[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2016, 16(02): 172-175.
[7]	邓国荣陈博艺李荣刘宁江李称才黄志杰钟其焕王振龙. 肝癌手术术前口服碳水化合物的安全性及疗效评估:随机对照研究[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2015, 15(03): 269-272.
[8]	陈诗强熊文华张光明. 跟骨锁定钢板内固定术治疗跟骨骨折的疗效观察[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2015, 15(01): 80-83.
[9]	钱斌王道猛吴俊张春阳. 全腔镜肺叶切除与开胸肺叶切除治疗早期肺癌的初步体会[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2014, 14(06): 665-667.
[10]	沈荣华许艾斌. 基层医院开展TST治疗重度混合痔临床疗效与价值[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2014, 14(01): 86-89.
[11]	岑庆君高忠恩殷万春彭立基冯荣亮黎海滨. 基底节区脑出血术后中度昏迷患者超早期气管切开的临床疗效[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2012, 12(04): 362-363.

输尿管气压弹道碎石术和微创经皮肾镜碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石的比较分析

Comparison between the transureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of upper ureteral stones

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics