钼靶与超声对乳腺恶性肿瘤直接征象的对照研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2013.04.003

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【摘要】目的 评价X线钼靶、彩色多普勒超声单独运用与联合运用在诊断乳腺恶性肿瘤准确率、对肿块显示率的差异及临床价值。方法回顾性分析564例乳腺恶性肿瘤患者的术前钼靶、超声及病理资料。评价564例乳腺恶性肿瘤患者的肿块的部位、形态、大小、边缘、密度或内部回声、后方回声,内部血流等影像学征象及其相关性,比较两种检查方法单独与联合运用对恶性肿瘤诊断率的差异。结果 564例乳腺恶性肿瘤,X线钼靶和彩色多普勒超声分别诊断422例和432例,两组联合诊断490例。其中浸润性导管癌439例,钼靶组诊断341例,超声组诊断356例,联合组诊断398例。结论彩色多普勒超声与X线钼靶检查联合运用可显著提高浸润性导管癌的诊断符合率,但两者单独运用检出率无明显统计学差异。对于致密型乳腺,超声对乳腺恶性肿块的准确率大于X线钼靶。对于脂肪型背景乳腺,钼靶对乳腺恶性肿块的准确率大于彩色多普勒超声。

关键词: X线钼靶, 彩色多普勒超声, 乳腺, 恶性肿瘤, 浸润性导管癌

Abstract:

【Abstract】〓Objective〓To explore the accuracy and the rate of visualization of the direct sign and the clinical value of ultrasonography (US) only,.mammography (MG) only and combination of them in diagnosis of breast malignant tumor. Methods A total of 564 cases with breast malignant tumor diagnosed by operation and pathology was performed both MG and US. The clinical data were analyzed retrospectively according to the tumor's characters of medical imaging such as tumor location, shape, size, border, density, internal or rear echo and blood supply. The multi-comparisons were performed on diagnostic accuracy among MG only,.US only and combination of both. Results There were 564 cases breast malignant tumors including 439 cases invasive ductal carcinomas. The correct diagnosis by MG was 422 cases and by UG was 432 cases and by combination of them was 490 cases of all patients. The correct diagnosis by MG was 341 cases and by US were 356 cases and by combination of them was 398 cases of 439 cases invasive ductal carcinomas patients. Conclusion The diagnostic accuracy of the combination of US and MG is higher than of only MG or only US of invasive ductal carcinomas,.but no difference between of only US and of only MG..The diagnostic accuracy of US only is higher than of MG only of tumors in dense breast,.but on the contrary of tumors in fat breast.

Key words: Ultrasonography, Mammography, Breast, Malignant tumor, Invasive ductal carcinoma cases

中图分类号:

R445

贺红艳陈建宇黄武斌. 钼靶与超声对乳腺恶性肿瘤直接征象的对照研究[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2013, 13(04): 277-281.

He Hongyan, Chen Jianyu, Huang Wubin. A comparative analysis on the direct sign of breast malignant tumor in ultrasonic and mammography[J]. Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery, 2013, 13(04): 277-281.

参考文献

[1]. 胡永升.现代乳腺影像诊断学[M].北京:科学出版社,2001:36-37,83
[2]. 杨志伟,赵哑平.早期乳腺癌的超声和X线摄影的对照研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2001,20 (1):14-16
[3]. 白人驹. 医学影像诊断学[M].2 版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社,2005:393.
[4]. 李树玲.乳腺肿瘤学[M]北京：科学技术出版社，2007:178-179.
[5]. 林僖, 王悦, 李安华, 等. 钼靶X线检查未见明确肿块和超声影像的对比分析[J]. 中国超声诊断杂志,2005,6(8) : 573-575
[6]. Cordon PB. Ultrasound for breast cancer screening and staging[J] . Radiol Clin North Am ,2002 ,40 (3) :431-441.
[7].杜勇.乳腺癌的影像学检测[J].国外医学临床放射学分册，1994,17（3）：130-134.
[8]. Shoma A ,Moutamed A, Ameen M, et al ,Ultrasound for accurate measurement of invasive breast canser turmor size.[J].Breast J,2006,12:252-256.
[9].鲍润贤. 中华影像医学. 乳腺卷[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2002∶681.
[10].张钧, 徐峰, 周连春. 小乳癌的超声诊断价值[J]. 实用肿瘤学杂志,1999, 13(3) : 198-199
[11]. FLOBBE K , NELEMANS PJ, KESSELS AG , et al. The role of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography in the detection of breast cancer: a systematic review [J]. Eur J Cancer, 2002, 38(8): 1044-1050.
[12].李洪林, 姜玉新, 郝玉芝, 等. 乳腺超声与X 线钼靶摄影的比较与联合应用[J] . 中华超声影像学杂志, 2006, 15(12) : 910-913.
[13].胡怡,赵维,黄嗣王.乳腺腺病的综合影像学诊断的临床研究[J].实用放射学杂志,
2001,17(4): 262-65.
[14].Kolb TM,Lichy J,Newhouse JH.Comparison of the performance of screening mammography,physical Examination,and breast US and evaluation of factors that infl uence them:an analysis of 27825 patient evaluations[J]. Radiology,2002,225(1):165-175.
[15].Berg WA, Blume JD, Corm ack JB, e t al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alonein women at elevated risk of b reast cancer [J]. JAMA,2008, 299(18) : 2151-2163.
[16].丁莹, 郭瑞强.高频彩超与相靶联合应用对乳腺癌的诊断价值[J] .现代肿瘤医学,2009, 17 (9) :1708 -1710 .