不同类型的不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折对术后患者的早期活动的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2020.04.019

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨股骨近端抗旋髓内钉（PFNA）治疗老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折对患者活动能力的影响。方法选择2018年6月~2019年7月期间我院收治的不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折（ITF）及接受股骨近端抗旋髓内钉（PFNA）固定手术的患者126例患者作为研究对象。根据AO分型将患者分为两组,第一组为A2.2和A2.3患者（A22+A23组）,第二组为A3.1和A3.2患者（A31+A32组）。评估两组患者的基本情况、术后并发症、随访、死亡率、术后复位、尖顶距（TAD）和Parker-Palmer活动评分（PPM）。结果两组在性别、年龄、患侧、ASA评分、麻醉类型、住院时间、手术时间、TAD值、复位值、死亡率等方面无显著性差异。A22+A23组患者的运动评分明显高于A31+A32组（P<0.05）。结论虽然TAD值与骨折复位状态无相关性,但A3型患者的PPM评分明显较差。因此,PFNA治疗术前AO分型为A3型的骨折比A2型的骨折疗效更差。

关键词: 髓内钉, 骨折固定, 早期活动, 粗隆间骨折

Abstract: Objective To assess the impact of uniform anti-rotational proximal femoral intramedullary nail （PFNA） use on patient mobility status with the treatment of two different unstable intertrochanteric femur fracture groups of geriatric patients. Methods 126 patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture （ITF） in our hospital from June 2018 to July 2019 were selected as the research objects. The patients underwent proximal femoral anti rotation intramedullary nail （PFNA） and assigned to two groups according to AO classification, group 1： A2.2 and A2.3; group 2： A3.1 and A3.2. The demographic data of the patients, postoperative complications, follow-up, mortality status, postoperative reduction, tip-apex distance （TAD）, and the Parker-Palmer mobility （PPM） score were evaluated. Results There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of gender,age,affected side, ASA score, anesthesia type, duration of hospitalization, duration of surgery, TAD values, reduction values, or mortality rate. The mobility scores of group 1 patients were significantly higher than those of group 2 （P<0.05）. Conclusion There were not relationship found between the TAD values and the reduction status of the patients, but the PPM scores of the A3 cases were determined to be significantly worse. Therefore, fractures with a preoperative classification of AO type A3 can be expected to have worse results than A2 ITF fractures.

Key words: intertrochanteric fractures, early mobilization, fracture fixation, intramedullary nailing

中图分类号:

R683.42

周密. 不同类型的不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折对术后患者的早期活动的影响[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2020, 20(04): 488-491.

ZHOU Mi. Effect of different types of unstable intertrochanteric fractures on early postoperative motion[J]. Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery, 2020, 20(04): 488-491.

参考文献

[1] Alexiou KI, Roushias A, Varitimidis SE, Malizos KN.Quality of life and psychological consequences in elderly patients after a hip fracture: a review[J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2018, 13: 143-150.
[2] LeBlanc ES, Hillier TA, Pedula KL, et al. Hip fracture and increased short-term but not long-term mortality in healthy older women[J]. Arch Intern Med, 2011, 171(20): 1831-1837.
[3] Kim SH, Meehan JP, Lee MA.Surgical treatment of trochanteric and cervical hip fractures in the United States: 2000-2009[J]. J Arthroplast, 2013, 28: 1386-1390.
[4] Barton TM, Gleeson R, Topliss C, et al.A comparison of the long gamma nail with the sliding hip screw for the treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2 fractures of the proximal part of the femur: a prospective randomized trial[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010, 92(4): 792-798.
[5] Parker MJ, Palmer CR.A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture[J]. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1993, 75(5): 797-798.
[6] Little NJ, Verma V, Fernando C, et al.A prospective trial comparing the Holland nail with the dynamic hip screw in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip[J]. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2008, 90(8): 1073-1078.
[7] Koval KJ, Skovron ML, Aharonoff GB, et al.Ambulatory ability after hip fracture. A prospective study in geriatric patients[J]. Clin Orthop, 1995, 310: 150-159.
[8] Karakus O, Ozdemir G, Karaca S, et al.The relationship between the type of unstable intertrochanteric femur fracture and mobility in the elderly[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2018, 13(1): 207.
[9] Merredy P, Kamath S, Ramakrishnan M, et al.The AO/ASIF proximal demoral nail antirotation (PFNA): a new design for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures[J]. Injury, 2009, 40(4): 428-432.
[10] Sircar P, Godkar D, Mahgrerefteh S, et al.Morbidity and mortality among patients with hip fractures surgically repaired within and after 48 hours[J]. Am J Therapeut, 2007, 14(6): 508-513.
[11] Zuckerman JD, Skovron ML, Koval KJ, et al.Postoperative complications and mortality associated with operative delay in older patients who have a fracture of the hip[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1997, 79(3): 470.
[12] Huang SG, Chen B, Zhang Y, et al.Comparison of the Clinical Effectiveness of PFNA, PFLCP, and DHS in Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture[J]. Am J Ther, 2017, 24(6): e659-e666.
[13] Müller F, Doblinger M, Kottmann T, Füchtmeier B. PFNA and DHS for AO/OTA 31-A2 fractures: radiographic measurements, morbidity and mortality [J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2019. 10.1007/s00068-019-01251-w.
[14] Ibrahim I, Appleton PT, Wixted JJ, et al.Implant cut-out following cephalomedullary nailing of intertrochanteric femur fractures: Are helical blades to blame?[J]. Injury, 2019, 50(4): 926-930.
[15] Murena L, Moretti A, Meo F, et al.Predictors of cut-out after cephalomedullary nail fixation of pertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective study of 813 patients[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2018, 138(3): 351-359.
[16] Elis J, Chechik O, Maman E, et al.Expandable proximal femoral nails versus 95° dynamic condylar screw-plates for the treatment of reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures[J]. Injury, 2012, 43(8): 1313-1317.
[17] Barquet A, Francesescoli L, Rienzi D, et al.Intertrochanteric- subtrochanteric fractures: treatment with the long Gamma nail[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2000, 14(5): 324-328.
[18] Frisch NB, Nahm NJ, Khalil JG, et al.Short versus long cephalomedullary nails for pertrochanteric hip fracture[J]. Orthopedics, 2017, 40(2): 83-88.
[19] Okcu G, Ozkayin N, Okta C, et al.Which implant is better for treating reverse obliquity fractures of the proximal femur: a standard or long nail?[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013, 471(9): 2768-2775.