神经根刺激器在治疗脊髓损伤所致神经原性膀胱功能障碍的应用价值

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2015.04.031

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【摘要】〓目的〓探讨神经根刺激器在治疗脊髓损伤所致神经原性膀胱功能障碍(NBD)的应用价值。方法〓选取2009年3月至2013年5月期间我院确诊治疗的脊髓损伤所致NBD患者72例,分刺激组和对照组,两组患者均给予每天2次口服托特罗定(2 mg/次)治疗,刺激组患者在此基础上给予神经根刺激治疗,其中刺激组依据治疗方法又分为骶神经电刺激(SNS)治疗组和神经肌肉电刺激(NES)治疗组,对所有患者进行为期3个月的随访,观察患者尿流动力学、尿道压力和日均排尿次数。结果〓在尿流动力学方面,NES组残余尿量和最大膀胱容量明显优于SNS组(P<0.017),而SNS组残余尿量与最大膀胱容量明显优于对照组(P<0.017);在逼尿肌压力水平与日均排尿次数方面,治疗后60 d,NES组明显优于对照组(P<0.017);治疗后120 d,NES组明显优于SNS组与对照组,SNS组明显优于对照组(P<0.017)。结论〓神经根刺激治疗有利于改善脊髓损伤所致NBD患者膀胱功能。

关键词: 神经根刺激器, 脊髓损伤, 神经原性膀胱功能障碍

Abstract: 【Abstract】〓Objective〓To discuss the value of nerve root stimulation system in the treatment of spinal cord injury caused by neurogenic bladder dysfunction (NBD). Methods〓Seventy-two patients with NBD were selected in our Hospitals. All patients were divided into control group (n=24) and stimulating group (n=48), two groups of patients were given oral tolterodain (2 mg/day) treatment. The stimulating group again divided into sacral nerve stimulation (SNS group, n=24) group and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NES group, n=24) group, and got three-month follow-up. The urine flow mechanics, urethral pressure and average daily number of urination were analyzed. Results〓The residual urine volume and maximum bladder capacity in NES group were significantly better than that of SNS group (P<0.017), and residual urine volume and maximum bladder capacity in SNS group were significantly better than that of control group (P<0.017). After treatment for 60 days, the detrusor pressure level and the average urination frequency in NES group were significantly improved than in control group (P<0.017), and after treatment for 120 days, the effect in NES group were better than and control group and SNS group (P<0.017). Conclusion〓Nerve root stimulation treatment can improve bladder function of the patients with NBD.

Key words: Nerve root stimulation system, Spinal cord injury, Neurogenic bladder dysfunction

中图分类号:

R651

王亮谷欣. 神经根刺激器在治疗脊髓损伤所致神经原性膀胱功能障碍的应用价值[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2015, 15(04): 483-485.

Wang Liang, Gu Xin. The application of nerve root stimulation system in the treatment of spinal cord injury caused by neurogenic bladder dysfunction[J]. Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery, 2015, 15(04): 483-485.

参考文献

[1]武富明,牛浩,李江涛等.建立人工膀胱反射弧治疗脊髓损伤后神经原性膀胱的临床研究[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2013,23(11):961-965.
[2]刘海杰,张立新,张志强.功能性磁刺激治疗神经源性膀胱的研究进展[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2012,34(5):390-392.
[3]赵通洲,王桂珍,赵志义等.罗格列酮治疗糖尿病神经源性膀胱15例[J].中国老年学杂志,2011,31(18):3617-3618.
[4]吴毓敏,刘俊芳,郭选贤.中西医结合治疗糖尿病神经源性膀胱及对尿流动力学的影响[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2011,17(16):234-235.
[5]LI Yan-tang,DONG Jun,NIAN Xiu-zhen,et al.Transurethral resection of bladder neck （female） and urinary sphincter （male） to treat neurogenic urinary dysfunction[J].Chinese Journal of Urology,2009(8):550-551.
[6]王丽娜,周慧敏,康岩等.糖尿病神经源性膀胱患者的尿流动力学变化及α-硫辛酸联合甲钴胺治疗的疗效[J].广东医学,2014,35(3):437-439.
[7]WANG Xiaodan, FENG Xiaodong, LIU Chengmei,et al.Clinical Observation on Umbilical Moxibustion for 30 Cases of Neurogenic Bladder After Spinal Cord Injury[J].Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2014,55(1):45-47.
[8]罗翱翔,由天辉,童钟.电针俞募穴治疗脊髓损伤神经源性膀胱的效果[J].广东医学,2013,34(24):3805-3808.
[9]LI Chang-si,MA Yue-wen.Therapeytic Effect of Biological Feedback Instrument in the Treatment of Neurogenic Bladder Due to Spinal Cord Injury[J].Journal of China Medical University,2013,42(5):469-471.
[10]王尊状.募穴下合穴相配合治疗糖尿病神经源性膀胱病32例[J].中国针灸,2013,33(4):314-314.
[11]孟玲,林庚庭.中西医结合治疗糖尿病神经源性膀胱44例[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2012,18(19):297-299.
[12]袁芳录.济生肾气丸加减治疗糖尿病神经源性膀胱20例[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2012,18(24):363-364.
[13]廖利民.神经源性膀胱的治疗现状和进展[J].中国康复医学杂志,2011,26(3):201-205.
[14]SUN Xiao-bing,LI Dian-guo,ZHANG Li,et al.The evaluation of tolterodine on children with neurogenic bladder[J].Chinese Journal of Pediatric Surgery,2011,32(3):199-201.
[15]WU Juan,LIAO Limin,WAN Li,et al.Electric stimulation for neurogenic bladder sensory dysfunction[J].Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord,2012,22(12):1059-1062.