ADHLP与加压空心钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间EvansI型骨折的比较

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2015.01.020

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【摘要】〓目的〓分析用解剖型髋动力带锁钢板(ADHLP)与加压空心钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间EvansI型骨折的治疗效果,比较两者的优缺点。方法〓回顾性分析我院自2008年03月至2014年05月收治的并获随访的老年股骨粗隆间Evans I型骨折患者38例,采用ADHLP组与加压空心钉组各19例,观察两组手术时间、出血量、临床愈合时间、手术后Harris评分等指标。结果〓加压空心钉组手术时间较短、术中及术后出血量较少(P<0.05),但ADHLP组临床愈合时间短(P<0.05),术后12个月Harris评分高(P<0.05)。结论〓在老年股骨粗隆间EvansⅠ型骨折患者耐受手术条件下,选择ADPHL与加压空心钉治疗各有优势。

关键词: 解剖型髋动力带锁钢板, 加压空心钉, 老年, 股骨粗隆间骨折

Abstract: 【Abstract】〓Objective〓To analysis of anatomical dynamic hip locking plate (ADHLP) and cannulated compression screw in treatment of Evans I femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly, comparing their advantages and disadvantages. Methods〓Thirty-eight elderly patients with Evans I intertrochanteric fracture treated and followed up in our hospital from Mar 2008 to May 2014, were selected and allocated by the ADHLP group (n=19) and the cannulated compression screw group (n=19) according to the surgical procedure. The operation duration, amount of bleeding, clinical healing duration after operation, Harris score and complications were observed in the two groups. Results〓The patients in cannulated compression screw group showed less bleeding, shorter operation time, but longer clinical healing time and higher Harris scores than those in ADHLP group (P<0.05). Conclusion〓ADPHL and cannulated screw approaches display their respective advantages in treatment of the elderly with intertrochanteric fractures EvansⅠ if the patients can tolerate the operation.

Key words: Anatomical dynamic hip lock plate, Cannulated compression screws, Elderly, Intertrochanteric fracture, EvansⅠ

中图分类号:

R683.42

罗程何颖宜李杰文黄炳生. ADHLP与加压空心钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间EvansI型骨折的比较[J]. 岭南现代临床外科, 2015, 15(01): 77-79.

Luo Cheng, He Yingyi, Li Jiewen, Huang Bingsheng. Comparison between anatomical dynamic hip lock plate and compresive hollow needle in the treatment of the Evans I intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly[J]. Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery, 2015, 15(01): 77-79.

参考文献

[1]Floyd JC, O’Toole RV, Stall A,et al.Biomechanical comparison of proximal locking plates and blade plates for the treatment of comminuted subtrochanteric femoral fractures[J].J Orthop Trauma,2009,23(9):628-633.
[2]李康养,马楚平,梁江山. DHS、PFNA及人工关节治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折临床疗效分析[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2011,(07):25-27.
[3]刘毅,陈海云,万豫尧. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后并发症发生率的预测[J].中国老年学杂志,2010,(17):2524-2525.
[4]崔风国,宋维,丛皎,等.不同方法治疗老年性股骨粗隆间骨折的临床分析[J].国际外科学杂志,2010,37(6):372-374.
[5]Finsen V, Johnsen LG, Trano G, et al.Hip fracture incidence in central Norway: a followup study[J].Clin Orthop RelatRes,2004,419:173-178.
[6]Jensen J S,Michaelsen M．Trochanteric femoral fractures treated with Mclaughlin osteosynthesis[J]．Aeta Orthop Stand，1975,46(5)：795-803．
[7]蒋协远,王大伟.骨科临床疗效评价标准[M].1版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005,131-134.
[8]丁跃华,王建雄,龚毅,等.股骨近端锁定钢板治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折26例[J].宁夏医学杂志,2010,32(6):549-549
[9]黄异飞,潘静,熊鹰.解剖型髋动力带锁钢板治疗股骨转子间骨折的疗效评价[J].中华创伤杂志,2009,25(1):61-65.
[10]熊鹰,王大兴,柳百烁. 解剖型髋动力带锁钢板的研制及临床应用[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2008,(06):419-422.
[11]谢晓明，肖建军，罗锡勇.髋动力带锁钢板与股骨近端锁定钢板治疗股骨转子部骨折的比较[J].实用骨科杂志,2013,（9）:780-783.
[12]陆裕朴，胥少汀，葛宝丰等.实用骨科学.北京：人民军医出版社，2005：688.
[13]李庆德.空心钉内固定治疗老年股骨颈骨折32例临床观察[J].航空航天医药,2010,(12):2350-2351.
[14]方洪松,甘经岳,彭吴. 股骨颈骨折空心加压螺钉内固定失败后的再手术治疗[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2012,(02):136-137.
[15]张庆明，沈惠良，雍宜民，等.经皮钛合金空心钉治疗高龄老年人粗隆间骨折[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,2002,17(5):332-334.